<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>FamYarn Genealogy Blog</title><link>https://blog.famyarn.com/</link><description>Recent content on FamYarn Genealogy Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 15:06:37 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.famyarn.com/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Hi, We're FamYarn! Nice to Meet You.</title><link>https://blog.famyarn.com/posts/hi-were-famyarn/</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 15:06:37 -0500</pubDate><guid>https://blog.famyarn.com/posts/hi-were-famyarn/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, we&amp;rsquo;re FamYarn! We&amp;rsquo;re excited to share our new family history software with you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We’re building a place for family history: something that helps you record the people, stories, and moments that tend
to slip away over time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not just a tree. Not just a collection of records. Something a little more human than that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We built FamYarn to be the kind of tool we wanted when we started exploring our own family histories. We wanted
something that felt more like a living, breathing family tree and less like a static database. We&amp;rsquo;ve done some things
differently, and we think it&amp;rsquo;s for the best. Time and time again, while we were building these tools, we thought,
&amp;ldquo;do we have to do it this way?&amp;rdquo;. And the answer was often &amp;ldquo;no, we don&amp;rsquo;t&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>